<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Resolve a Fluid Header/Footer Problem When the Window is Resized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/</link>
	<description>Web Design Articles &#38; Tutorials. To make the web impressive.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:11:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azerue</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/#comment-9607</link>
		<dc:creator>Azerue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2037#comment-9607</guid>
		<description>thx alot it worked for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx alot it worked for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Lazaris</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/#comment-9006</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Lazaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 12:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2037#comment-9006</guid>
		<description>Good point, but CSS expressions are very bad for performance, so other solutions should be tried first:

http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#css_expressions

This would especially be the case with IE6 which is already slow by nature. Why make it slower? Better to give it a degraded experience instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, but CSS expressions are very bad for performance, so other solutions should be tried first:</p>
<p><a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#css_expressions" rel="nofollow">http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#css_expressions</a></p>
<p>This would especially be the case with IE6 which is already slow by nature. Why make it slower? Better to give it a degraded experience instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/#comment-8561</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2037#comment-8561</guid>
		<description>Good article, worked for me! Thanks Louis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, worked for me! Thanks Louis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/#comment-7440</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2037#comment-7440</guid>
		<description>Thanks Louis!  Great article that lays out a simple fix to a very annoying problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Louis!  Great article that lays out a simple fix to a very annoying problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/#comment-7208</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2037#comment-7208</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only just come across this problem today and the way a got around it was using a min-width selector, I was sure there was a better way turns out not :D good post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only just come across this problem today and the way a got around it was using a min-width selector, I was sure there was a better way turns out not :D good post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivanhoe</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/#comment-6947</link>
		<dc:creator>ivanhoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2037#comment-6947</guid>
		<description>body { display: inline-block }

seems to solve the problem (except in IE)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>body { display: inline-block }</p>
<p>seems to solve the problem (except in IE)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/#comment-6735</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2037#comment-6735</guid>
		<description>Solution for IE6 (served via conditional comments):

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;
body {
	width: expression(document.body.clientWidth &lt;961 ? &quot;960px&quot; : &quot;100%&quot; );
}
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solution for IE6 (served via conditional comments):</p>
<pre><code>
body {
	width: expression(document.body.clientWidth &lt;961 ? "960px" : "100%" );
}
</code></pre>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bali</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/#comment-6329</link>
		<dc:creator>Bali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2037#comment-6329</guid>
		<description>Could you please convert this code in jquery.. :)

Hope you don&#039;t mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you please convert this code in jquery.. :)</p>
<p>Hope you don&#8217;t mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lam Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/#comment-6291</link>
		<dc:creator>Lam Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2037#comment-6291</guid>
		<description>No way is better than this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way is better than this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/fluid-header-footer-problem/#comment-6135</link>
		<dc:creator>M Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2037#comment-6135</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t worry too much about IE 6. It&#039;s trending around only 10% of users, and those must be having trouble at every site. Here&#039;s my company site&#039;s current IE user usage for the month
 	
8.0	11,958 	63.85% 	
7.0	4,870 	26.01% 	
6.0	1,895 	10.12%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t worry too much about IE 6. It&#8217;s trending around only 10% of users, and those must be having trouble at every site. Here&#8217;s my company site&#8217;s current IE user usage for the month</p>
<p>8.0	11,958 	63.85%<br />
7.0	4,870 	26.01%<br />
6.0	1,895 	10.12%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
