<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE-only Styles: Where Should They Be Placed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/</link>
	<description>Web Design Articles &#38; Tutorials. To make the web impressive.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:11:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/#comment-9859</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2007#comment-9859</guid>
		<description>Appreciate the tutorial, makes for interesting reading. It&#039;s handy having the drawbacks listed separately from the benefits. We normally use Option #2 to be honest.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the tutorial, makes for interesting reading. It&#8217;s handy having the drawbacks listed separately from the benefits. We normally use Option #2 to be honest.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CodeMyConcept</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/#comment-8829</link>
		<dc:creator>CodeMyConcept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2007#comment-8829</guid>
		<description>The mission now, is to get IE6 to a 1% in 3 years and we are doing our best.

Great Article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mission now, is to get IE6 to a 1% in 3 years and we are doing our best.</p>
<p>Great Article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobs</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/#comment-6725</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2007#comment-6725</guid>
		<description>I Mean option 3!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Mean option 3!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobs</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/#comment-6724</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2007#comment-6724</guid>
		<description>Well explained, I think option is better if you develop a wordpress theme or something that finally someone else may modify the css, being in the same file will be easy for end user...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well explained, I think option is better if you develop a wordpress theme or something that finally someone else may modify the css, being in the same file will be easy for end user&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Lazaris</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/#comment-6309</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Lazaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 03:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2007#comment-6309</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this. Isn&#039;t it true, however, that server-side browser detection is not reliable? I&#039;ve been told that a browser can be faked on the client side (through a registry change or something..?). Of course, I don&#039;t know how many people would actually do that (if any), so your solution may be quite feasible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this. Isn&#8217;t it true, however, that server-side browser detection is not reliable? I&#8217;ve been told that a browser can be faked on the client side (through a registry change or something..?). Of course, I don&#8217;t know how many people would actually do that (if any), so your solution may be quite feasible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A3sthetix</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/#comment-6307</link>
		<dc:creator>A3sthetix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2007#comment-6307</guid>
		<description>Option 6: Use server-side scripting to determine which browser is in use and dynamically insert the correct stylesheet.
Drawbacks:
- Separate CSS files are needed
- Need to know how to program
Benefits:
- No extra HTTP requests

Option 7: Use serverside scripting to output CSS. Create a file like style.css.php and use code to display rules for specific browsers. Could parse a CSS file or run functions within to output rules.
Drawbacks:
- Need to know how to program
- More time spent testing/coding (possibly)
Benefits:
- Single HTTP request
- Easy setup once concept is understood
- Code can be used for multiple sites</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Option 6: Use server-side scripting to determine which browser is in use and dynamically insert the correct stylesheet.<br />
Drawbacks:<br />
- Separate CSS files are needed<br />
- Need to know how to program<br />
Benefits:<br />
- No extra HTTP requests</p>
<p>Option 7: Use serverside scripting to output CSS. Create a file like style.css.php and use code to display rules for specific browsers. Could parse a CSS file or run functions within to output rules.<br />
Drawbacks:<br />
- Need to know how to program<br />
- More time spent testing/coding (possibly)<br />
Benefits:<br />
- Single HTTP request<br />
- Easy setup once concept is understood<br />
- Code can be used for multiple sites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/#comment-6090</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2007#comment-6090</guid>
		<description>Same here since I don&#039;t want multiple files open when I&#039;m coding the same thing. I also use divs rather than changing the whole body tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here since I don&#8217;t want multiple files open when I&#8217;m coding the same thing. I also use divs rather than changing the whole body tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edison A. Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/#comment-5964</link>
		<dc:creator>Edison A. Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2007#comment-5964</guid>
		<description>Great article, thank you for sharing and the comments...  good discussion... no doubt. Thanks JB and BigAB that&#039;s some thing that I&#039;ll be trying to do more often from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, thank you for sharing and the comments&#8230;  good discussion&#8230; no doubt. Thanks JB and BigAB that&#8217;s some thing that I&#8217;ll be trying to do more often from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TutorialFeed</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/#comment-5888</link>
		<dc:creator>TutorialFeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2007#comment-5888</guid>
		<description>Very useful post. I have bookmarked this post. Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful post. I have bookmarked this post. Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Lazaris</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/ie-only-styles/#comment-5789</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Lazaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 05:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=2007#comment-5789</guid>
		<description>A few months ago this site was loading about 20+ scripts/stylesheets, and I&#039;ve reduced it to what it is now (around 8-12, depending on the browser). So, it&#039;s not hypocritical at all, because I have &quot;reduced&quot; HTTP requests as I said in the article.

Not to mention that it&#039;s not as important on a site like this. My advice on any article you read here or anywhere else is mainly for client work, where speed optimization is much more important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago this site was loading about 20+ scripts/stylesheets, and I&#8217;ve reduced it to what it is now (around 8-12, depending on the browser). So, it&#8217;s not hypocritical at all, because I have &#8220;reduced&#8221; HTTP requests as I said in the article.</p>
<p>Not to mention that it&#8217;s not as important on a site like this. My advice on any article you read here or anywhere else is mainly for client work, where speed optimization is much more important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
