<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will EOT Become the Standard for Font Embedding?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.impressivewebs.com/will-eot-become-the-standard-for-font-embedding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/will-eot-become-the-standard-for-font-embedding/</link>
	<description>Web Design Articles &#38; Tutorials. To make the web impressive.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:16:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/will-eot-become-the-standard-for-font-embedding/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=938#comment-874</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t stand tff. I hope EOT becomes the standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t stand tff. I hope EOT becomes the standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/will-eot-become-the-standard-for-font-embedding/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=938#comment-864</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t mind too much whether .eot becomes the standard or if its another format altogether. The important thing for me is just that one format does become the clear leader so we can stop having to embed 3 different ones!

With that said, an open format would be a lot more appealing than a proprietary one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t mind too much whether .eot becomes the standard or if its another format altogether. The important thing for me is just that one format does become the clear leader so we can stop having to embed 3 different ones!</p>
<p>With that said, an open format would be a lot more appealing than a proprietary one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/will-eot-become-the-standard-for-font-embedding/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=938#comment-826</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by cmScribe: RT @NicholasPatten: Will EOT Become the Standard for Font Embedding? http://bit.ly/20UMd1 ^DM...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by cmScribe: RT @NicholasPatten: Will EOT Become the Standard for Font Embedding? <a href="http://bit.ly/20UMd1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/20UMd1</a> ^DM&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/will-eot-become-the-standard-for-font-embedding/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=938#comment-825</guid>
		<description>EOT sucks - has anyone actually tried to use WEFT to create a font for IE to use? It&#039;s a pain at best. Microsoft need to come up with a better (and free of course) way for people to create their stupid format before anyone will use it, whether it&#039;s a W3 recommendation or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EOT sucks &#8211; has anyone actually tried to use WEFT to create a font for IE to use? It&#8217;s a pain at best. Microsoft need to come up with a better (and free of course) way for people to create their stupid format before anyone will use it, whether it&#8217;s a W3 recommendation or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/will-eot-become-the-standard-for-font-embedding/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=938#comment-824</guid>
		<description>As stated above, no browser supports the .eot format but IE so why bother? All the other browsers support the other format and IE is a dying browser so there&#039;s no way anyone should bother with .eot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated above, no browser supports the .eot format but IE so why bother? All the other browsers support the other format and IE is a dying browser so there&#8217;s no way anyone should bother with .eot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Will EOT Become the Standard for Font Embedding? &#124; Impressive Webs -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/will-eot-become-the-standard-for-font-embedding/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Will EOT Become the Standard for Font Embedding? &#124; Impressive Webs -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=938#comment-823</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nicholas Patten and WPstudios, NetReach. NetReach said: RT @NicholasPatten: Will EOT Become the Standard for Font Embedding? http://bit.ly/20UMd1 ^DM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nicholas Patten and WPstudios, NetReach. NetReach said: RT @NicholasPatten: Will EOT Become the Standard for Font Embedding? <a href="http://bit.ly/20UMd1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/20UMd1</a> ^DM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.impressivewebs.com/will-eot-become-the-standard-for-font-embedding/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impressivewebs.com/?p=938#comment-820</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t mind using eot&#039;s over .otf or .ttf, but I won&#039;t touch &#039;em until firefox and safari come around to the idea, with or without the blessing of the W3C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind using eot&#8217;s over .otf or .ttf, but I won&#8217;t touch &#8216;em until firefox and safari come around to the idea, with or without the blessing of the W3C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
